Role of absorptive capacity in ambidexterity (exploration and exploitatopn) improvement

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Advertising planning expert

Abstract

One important factor influencing business success is the number of innovations introduced to market. Innovations can be exploitative or exploitative. While exploitative innovations improve efficiency in short term, explorative innovations improve flexibility and help firms to face changing environment in long term. Since the potential and realized absorptive capacity could have different effects on explorative and exploitative innovations, this research aims to investigate the relationships between ambidexterity and absorptive capacity in order to explain the inter-relationships of their sub-constructs. This is an applied research which uses a survey based descriptive correlational method. It also uses Structural Equation modelling to analyze data. To this end, a random sampling procedure was used to collect data from a sample of 90 defense firms (also called industries in Iran defense sector). The results showed that the realized absorptive capacity is an antecedent for exploration and exploitation. Furthermore, while potential absorptive capacity positively moderates the relationship between realized absorptive capacity and explorative innovation, it negatively moderates the relationship between former and exploitative innovation.

Keywords

References

-         Adler, P., & Borys, B. (1996). Two Types of Bureaucracy: Enabling and Coercive. Administrative Science Quarterly, 61-89.
-         Badillo, E., & Moreno, R. (2014). Does absorptive capacity determine collaborative research returns to innovation? A geographical dimension. working paper.
-         Benner , M. J., & Tushman, M. L. (2003). Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited. The Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 238-256.
-         Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1989). Innovation and learning: the two faces of R & D. The Economic Journal, 568-596.
-         Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective On Learning And Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly (35:1), 128-152.
-         Cooper, V. A., & Molla, A. (2014). Absorptive Capacity and Contextual Factors that Influence Green IT Assimilation. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 271-288.
-         Cronbach, L. (1951). Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests. Psychometrical, 297-334.
-         Datta, A. (2011). Review and Extension on Ambidexterity: A Theoretical Model Integrating Networks and Absorptive Capacity. Journal of Management and Strategy, www.sciedu.ca/jms.
-         Deeds, D. (2001). The Role of R&D Intensity, Technical Development and Absorptive Capacity in Creating Entrepreneurial Wealth in High Technology Start-ups. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 29-47.
-         Diamantopoulos, A., Sarstedt, M., Fuchs, C., Wilczynski, P., & Kaiser, S. (2012). guidelines for choosing between multi-item and single-item scales for construct measurement: a predictive validity perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 434-449.
-         Floyd, S. W., & Lane, P. J. (2000). Strategizing throughout the Organization: Managing Role Conflict in Strategic Renewal. The Academy of Management Review, 25, 154-177.
-         Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981). structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 39-50.
-         Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The Antecedents, Consequences, and Mediating Role of Organizational Ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 209-226.
-         Jansen, J. (2005). Ambidextrous Organizations, A Multiple-Level Study of Absorptive Capacity, Exploratory and Exploitative Innovation and Performance. Rotterdam: Erasmus University.
-         Jansen, J., Van Den Bosch, F., & Volberda, H. (2005). Strategische vernieuwing van ondernemingen: het managen van innovatie en efficiency. Management & Organisatie, (in Dutch), 25-36.
-         Kostopoulos, K., Papalexandris, A., Papachroni, M., & Ioannou, G. (2011). Absorptive capacity, innovation, and financial performance. Journal of Business Research, 1335-1343.
-         Lane, P., Salk, J., & Lyles, A. (2001). IJV Learning and Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 1139-1161.
-         Levinthal , D. A., & March, J. G. (1993). The Myopia of Learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 95-112.
-         Lichtenthaler, U. (2009). Absorptive Capacity, Environmental Turbulance, and the Complementarity of Organizational Learning processes. Academy of Management Journal, 822-846.
-         March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 71-87.
-         Murovec, N., & Prodan, I. (2009). Absorptive capacity, its determinants, and influence on innovation output: Cross-cultural validation of the structural model. Technovation, 859-872.
-         Nieto, M., & Quevedo, P. (2005). Absorptive capacity, technological opportunity, knowledge spillovers, and innovative effort. Technovation, 25(10), 1141-1157.
-         O’Reilly III, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2013). Organizational Ambidexterity: Past, Present and Future. Academy of Management Perspectives, 324-338.
-         Tenenhaus, M., Amato, S., & Esposito Vinzi, V. (2004). A global goodness-of-fit index for PLS structural equation modelling. In: Proceedings of XLII SIS scientific meeting, 739-742.
-         Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action: Social sciences bases of administrative theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
-         Tsai, W. (2001). Knowledge Transfer in Intraorganizational Networks: Effects of Network Position and Absorptive Capacity on Business Unit Innovation and Performance. The Academy of Management Journal, 996-1004.
-         Tushman, M. L., & O'Reilly, C. (1996). Ambidextrous Organizations: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change. California Management Review, 8-30.
-         Van den Bosch, F. A., Volberda , H. W., & de Boer, M. (1999). Coevolution of Firm Absorptive Capacity and Knowledge Environment: Organizational Forms and Combinative Capabilities . Organization Science, 551-568.
-         Van Wijk, R., Van Den Bosch, F., & H., V. (2001). The impact of the depth and breadth of absorbed knowledge on levels of exploration and exploitation. paper presented at the Academy of Management Conference.
-         Weick, K. (1982). Management of organizational change among loosely coupled elements. In P. Goodman, Change in Organizations (pp. 375-408). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
-         Wetzels, M., Odekerken-Schroder, G., & Van Oppen, C. (2009). using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: Guidelines and empirical illustration. MIS Quarterly, 33(1), 177.
-         Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, And Extention. Academy Of Management Review, (27:2), 185-203.
-         Zollo, M., & Winter, S. (2002). Deliberate Learning and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities. Organization Science,, 339-351.
 
Journal of Technology Development Management
Volume 4, Issue 1
June 2016
Pages 77-96

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 18 October 2016
  • Revise Date: 10 April 2017
  • Accept Date: 09 May 2017

Share

How to cite

Statistics