رتبه‌بندی روش‌های مناسب ارزش‌گذاری فناوری‌های زیستی: حوزه تخمیر

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 عضو هیئت علمی، پژوهشکده مطالعات فناوری های نوین، سازمان پژوهش های علمی و صنعتی ایران، تهران

2 دانشجوی دکتری سیاست‌گذاری علم و فناوری، دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه تهران، تهران

3 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت تکنولوژی، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران.

چکیده

امروزه لزوم توجه ­به ماهیت هر فناوری و استفاده از روش­ های متناسب با ویژگی­ های آن، در ارزش­ گذاری فناوری ­ها بیش‌ازپیش اهمیت یافته است. درهمین‌راستا، در پژوهش حاضر تلاش شده است تا روش­ های مناسب ارزش­ گذاری فناوری­ های زیستی حوزه تخمیر، به­ عنوان یکی از فناوری­ های مهم و پرکاربرد، رتبه­ بندی شوند؛ بنابراین پس از مطالعه پیشینه، مصاحبه با خبرگان و تحلیل پرسشنامه تکمیل‌شده توسط خبرگان فناوری‌های زیستی حوزه تخمیر، 36 شاخص کلیدی مؤثر­بر انتخاب روش مناسب ارزش ­گذاری فناوری در فناوری‌های زیستی حوزه تخمیر استخراج و در 4 دسته سیاست­ های سازمان، محیط سیاسی و قانونی، ویژگی­ های بازار و صنعت و نهایتاً ویژگی­ های فناوری دسته‌بندی‌ شدند­. سپس به­ کمک خبرگان مدیریت فناوری و بااستفاده ­از مدل تاپسیس، رتبه ­بندی روش ­های مناسب ارزش ­گذاری فناوری در فناوری‌های زیستی حوزه تخمیر انجام شد. نتایج پژوهش نشان می ­دهد که مدل­ های «درخت دوجمله‌ای»، «اختیار معامله»، «بلک شولز» و «بازارمحور» به­ ترتیب مناسب ­ترین روش­های ارزش‌گذاری فناوری در فناوری‌های زیستی حوزه تخمیر محسوب می‌شوند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Ranking the Appropriate Methods for Valuation of Biotechnologies: Fermentation Area

نویسندگان [English]

  • Ghasem Ramezanpour Nargesi 1
  • Mahdi Hajari 2
  • Mahdi Hamidi 3
1 Faculty member, Departement of Technology Development Studies (DTDS), Iranian Research Organization for Science and Technology (IROST), Tehran, Iran.
2 PhD Candidate of Science and Technology Policy, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
3 PhD Candidate of Technology Management, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]

One of the factors that determines which technology valuation method should be selected, is the set of special features of that technology in point and the context around it. This paper aims to identify technology valuation methods in the field of fermentation within the field of biotechnology as an important and widely used technology and rank the valuation techniques for them accordingly. The research methodology is based on a survey carried out and the data collection methods are interviews and distribution of questionnaires. After reviewing the literature, the paper presents its findings which shows 36 indicators identified as key indicators affecting the selection of appropriate technology valuation methods. These indicators are categorized in organizational policies, political and legal environment, and market and industry characteristics, as well as technology features category. Then, the technology valuation methods are ranked within the field of fermentation, by using the questionnaires of the TOPSIS decision-making model completed by technology management experts. The results show that "binomial model," "bargaining power," "Black Scholes" and "market-oriented" are, respectively, the foremost appropriate methods for technology valuation within the field of fermentology.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Technology Pricing
  • Technology valuation
  • Biotechnology
  • Fermentation

مراجع

Arnold, T. (1987). Factors in Pricing Licence. Les Novellas.
Bandarian, R. (2005). Commercialization and business potential assessment: Approaches [Conference presentation, in Persian]. Third International Management Conference, Tehran, Iran. Retrieved from https://civilica.com/doc/65926
Bandarian, R., & Mousaie, A. (2008). Valuation and pricing of chemicals and petrochemicals know-how by real option [In Persian]. Management Research in Iran,12(1), 79-103. https://mri.modares.ac.ir/article-19-5426-en.html
Bidault, F. (1989). Technology pricing: From principles to strategy. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-10393-5
Boer, P. F. (2004). Technology valuation solutions. John Wiley & Sons.
Chiu, Y. J., & Chen, Y. W. (2007). Using AHP in patent valuation. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 46(7-8), 1054-1062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2007.03.009
Gharibi, J., & Tabatabaian, S. (2008). A review of concepts and quantitative methods in technology valuation [In Persian]. Roshd-e-Fanavari Journal of Science & Technology Parks and Incubators, 4(13), 11-19. http://www.roshdefanavari.ir/En-Article/13930615105181847
Ghazinoory, S. S. (2005). A review of the national nanotechnology planning experience of the country: Future strategy (Iran nanotechnology ten years) [Conference presentation, in Persian]. Second International Conference on Management of Technology,Tehran. Iran. Retrieved from https://civilica.com/doc/43193
Ghazinoory, S. S., Rajabzadeh Ghatromi, A., & Mavaddat, P. (2016). Designing a model for know-how valuation for techmarts [In Persian]. Journal of Technology Development Management, 3(4), 45-80. https://doi.org/10.22104/jtdm.2016.397
Knowledge Based Value Research, (2019, October). Global fermentation chemicals market by application (Industrial, plastics & fibers, food and beverages, pharmaceutical and nutritional and other applications) By product (Alcohols, organic Acid, enzymes and other products) [Market overview]. https://www.kbvresearch.com/fermentation-chemicals-market/
Goodarzi, M., Bamdadsoofi, J., Arabi, S. M., & Amiri, M. (2013). A model for technology commercialization in public research organizations of Iran [In Persian]. Journal of Technology Development Management, 1(1), 37-66. https://doi.org/10.22104/jtdm.2013.3
Jang, W. J., & Ryu, J. Y. (2008, July). Technology valuation model in defense offset trade: Income approach In PICMET'08-2008 Portland international conference on management of engineering & technology (pp. 2521-2534). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/picmet.2008.4599879
Mohammadi, M., & Aldaghi, A. (2014). Determining the importance of effective indicators in choosing technology pricing method using fuzzy delphi hierarchical analysis process [Conference presentation, in Persian]. Third international Conference on Management of Technology, Tehran, Iran.
Molayi, F. (2012). A Study on technology pricing methods [In Persian]. Basparesh, 2(2), 59-65. https://doi.org/10.22063/basparesh.2012.944
Mousaei, A., Moghadam, A., Ghadirian, A. A., & Bandarian, R. (2008). A model for chemical products know-how pricing [In Persian]. Knowledge And Development, 15(22), 169-186. https://www.sid.ir/fa/journal/viewpaper.aspx?id=80501
Mousavi, S., & Tabatabaian, S. (2014). Identification and ranking of technology valuation indicators in the Iranian oil industry [Conference presentation, in Persian]. Third international Conference on Management of Technology, Tehran, Iran.
Park, Y., & Park, G. (2004). A new method for technology valuation in monetary value: Procedure and application. Technovation, 24(5), 387-394. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0166-4972(02)00099-8
Razgaitis, R. (2003). Valuation and pricing of technology-based intellectual property. Wiley.
Reilly, R. F., & Schweihs, R. P. (1998). Valuing intangible assets. McGraw Hill Professional.
Tabatabaian, S., & Gharibi, J. (2014). Identifying and ranking technology valuation indicators in automotive industry [In Persian]. Journal of Technology Development Management, 2(2), 9-28. https://doi.org/10.22104/jtdm.2014.134
Safari, H., & Aldaghi, A. (2016). Developing a model for valuation of biotechnological innovations based on patent ranking [In Persian]. Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 9(2), 63-96. http://jstp.nrisp.ac.ir/article_12954.html
Shafia, M.A., Mohammadi, M., Aldaghi, A., & Hamidi, A. (2013). Presenting a model for selecting an appropriate method for technology valuation and pricing: A case study of antibacterial nano-tiles [In Persian]. Innovation Management Journal, 2(3), 51-71. http://www.nowavari.ir/article_14639.html?lang=en
Shafia, M.A., Shakeri, A., & Ameri, M. (2010). Comparison and determination of factors affecting the choice of technology pricing method [Conference presentation, in Persian]. Fourth National Conference on Management of Technology, Tehran, Iran. Retrieved from https://civilica.com/doc/94656
مدیریت توسعه فناوری
دوره 8، شماره 4
اسفند 1399
صفحه 169-196

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 23 بهمن 1398
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 15 دی 1399
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 14 بهمن 1399

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار