شناسایی شکست‌های نظام علم و فناوری کشور با استفاده از تحلیل شبکه و تحلیل در عملیات نرم

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار، پژوهشکده مطالعات فناوری های نوین، سازمان پژوهش های علمی و صنعتی ایران

2 دکترای سیاست‌گذاری بازرگانی، دانشکده مدیریت، دانشکدگان مدیریت، دانشگاه تهران

3 دکترای مدیریت صنعتی گرایش تحقیق در عملیات، دانشکده مدیریت، دانشکدگان مدیریت، دانشگاه تهران

چکیده

علم و فناوری به عنوان یکی از فرآیندهای کلان ملی، نقش حیاتی در تحقق اهداف توسعه‌ای کشور ایفا می‌کند. مدیریت و پیشبرد این حوزه نیازمند مصون‌سازی و ارتقاء مستمر است. این پژوهش با هدف شناسایی و تحلیل شکست‌های نظام علم و فناوری کشور، با استفاده از روش‌های تحلیل شبکه و تحلیل عملیات نرم، نقاط ضعف سیستمی در ابعاد نهادی، زیرساختی، ارتباطی و منابعی را شناسایی کرد. نتایج نشان داد که ضعف‌های ساختاری در هماهنگی نهادها، کمبود زیرساخت‌های فیزیکی و نهادی، و عدم تطابق نقش‌ها با وظایف تعریف‌شده نهادها، از مهم‌ترین چالش‌های موجود است. همچنین، شش نهاد کلیدی به‌عنوان اولویت‌های تغییر برای بهبود عملکرد نظام علم و فناوری تعیین شدند. این پژوهش با ارائه چارچوبی جامع و بسته‌های پیشنهادی عملی، راهکارهایی برای مصون‌سازی مدیریت این نظام در برابر تهدیدهای داخلی و خارجی پیشنهاد می‌دهد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Identifying failures in the country's science and technology system using network analysis and soft operations analysis

نویسندگان [English]

  • Jamal khani Jazani 1
  • Ali Radadi 2
  • Amir Azar Far 3
  • sahar Jafari 3
1 Associate Professor, New Technologies Research Institute, Iranian Research Organization for Science and Technology
2 PhD in Business Policy, Faculty of Management, Faculties of Management, University of Tehran
3 PhD in Industrial Management, Operations Research, Faculty of Management, Faculties of Management, University of Tehran
چکیده [English]

Science and technology, as a crucial national process, play a vital role in achieving the country’s development goals. This study aimed to identify and analyze systemic failures in Iran’s science and technology system using network analysis and soft operations research methods. Systemic weaknesses were identified across four dimensions: institutional, infrastructural, communicative, and resource-based. The results revealed significant challenges, including poor coordination among institutions, a lack of physical and institutional infrastructure, and misalignment between institutional roles and their defined responsibilities. Moreover, six key institutions, including the Vice Presidency for Science and Technology, universities, and financial entities, were identified as priorities for systemic change. This study provides a comprehensive framework and actionable policy recommendations to enhance institutional coordination, improve infrastructure, and safeguard the science and technology system against internal and external threats.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • protection
  • network analysis
  • analysis in soft operations
  • systemic failures
  • national innovation system
Aryngazin, A. (2023). Outlines of the Science and Technology System: A Look into the Past for Forming Policy for the Development of the Next Generation Ecosystem. Part 1. https://doi.org/10.19181/smtp.2023.5.4.2
Asadi Fard, R., Tabatabaeiyan, S. H., Bamdad Sofi, J., & Tagva, M. R. (2014). The impact of the formation and growth pattern of science and technology cooperation networks on their sustainability. Technology Development Management. https://doi.org/10.22104/JTDM.2014.61
Carlsson, B. & Jacobsson, S. (1997). Diversity creation and technological systems: A technology policy perspective. Research Policy, 26(3), 233-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00005-1
Collection of Statements by the Supreme Leader, Retrieved from the website of the Office for the Preservation of Works of Ayatollah Khamenei at: www.khamenei.ir
Economic Defense Headquarters (2015) Strategic Document of the Country's Economic Defense, Tehran: Passive Defense Organization of the Country.
Edward J. Hackett [ed.] 2007The handbook of science and technology studies, MIT Press, 3rd ed. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Brian-Martin-21/publication/287494748_Science_technology_and_social_movements/links/5d11f82392851cf44049810f/Science-technology-and-social-movements.pdf
Ghazi Nouri, Seyed Sepehr (2002) Science and Technology Policy and Planning, Case Study of Nanotechnology in Iran, Office of Technology Cooperation of the Presidency, Iran. [In Persian]
Goodarzi, M., Rezaalizadeh, H., Gharibi, J., & Mohseni, M. (2014). Pathology of science and technology policies in Iran: An analysis of five-year development plans. Technology Development Management, 2(3), 137–161. https://doi.org/10.22104/JTDM.2015.184
 Khodadad Hosseini, Seyed Hamid; Danaeefard, Hassan (2004) Institutional Frameworks in the National Innovation System: A Comparative Approach to the Role of Government and Public Administration, Management Studies of Improvement and Transformation Quarterly, Autumn and Winter, No. 43 and 44. [In Persian]
Lee, Ting-Lin (2006) Action strategies for strengthening industrial clusters in southern Taiwan, Technology in Society, vol. 28, pp 533–552. DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2006.08.002
Manteghi, Manouchehr; Hassani, Ali; Bushehri, Alireza (2009) Identifying the Challenges of Policy-Making in Iran's National Innovation System, Science and Technology Policy Quarterly, Second Year, Autumn and Winter, No. 3. [In Persian]
Marzocchi, C. & Montresor, S. (2013). The effects of policy on national innovation systems: Evidence from two selected countries. Research Policy, 42(5), 1009–1020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.12.003
Marzucchi, Alberto; Montresor, Sandro (2013) The multi-dimensional additionality of innovation policies. A multi-level application to Italy and Spain, University of Sussex: SPRU centre, Working Paper Series: SWPS 2013-4
Mir Emadi, Tahereh (2012) Circuits of Underdevelopment and their Impact on the National Innovation System in Iran, Science and Technology Policy Quarterly, Autumn, No. 17. [In Persian]
Mobini Dehkordi, Ali; Hatami, Hamid Reza; Azizi, Majid (2011) Determining the Current Status of the Functions of the National Innovation System of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Strategic Defense Studies Quarterly, Winte, No. 4. [In Persian]
Norouzi, Effat; Tabatabaeian, Seyed Habibollah (2016) Explaining the Weaknesses of Iran's National Innovation System with a Functionalist Approach, Rahyaft, No. 62, Summer. [In Persian]
Norouzi, Effat; Tabatabaeian, Seyed Habibollah; Ghazi Nouri, Seyed Soroush (2012) Evaluating the Impact of Intermediary Institutions' Functions in Removing the Weaknesses of Iran's National Innovation System, Journal of Science and Technology Policy, Eighth Year, No. 1, Spring. [In Persian]
Shafizadeh, Hamid (2013) Investigating the Development Status of the National Innovation System, Social Cultural Strategy, Autumn, No. 8 (pp. 141-162). [In Persian]
Shahmirzaei, Alireza (2000) Distinguishing Technology from Science and its Policy and Strategic Consequences, Tehran: Iran Technology Analysts Network. [In Persian]
Shahpasand, Ghasemi, Alipour, & Mahmoudi. (2024). Analysis of barriers to the development of technologies resulting from agricultural research projects. Technology Development Management, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.22104/JTDM.2025.7314.3382
Shirzadegan, Safdari Ranjbar, & Alizadeh. (2024). Identifying and classifying systemic failures in Iran's national innovation system. Science and Technology Policy. [In Persian]
Shirzadegan, Safdari Ranjbar, & Alizadeh. (2025). Analyzing the Systemic Failures of Iran's Innovation System; Structural-Functional Analysis Approach. Management Improvement. [In Persian]
Smith, K. (2000). Innovation systems and systemic failure. Research Policy, 29(5), 559–566. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00075-5
Tabatabaiian, Habibollah (2007) Drafting a Short-Term Document for the Development of Science and Technology in the Country, Tehran: Center for Scientific Policy Research. Document T 232.
Tamm, Dorel (2010) System failures in public sector innovation support measures: The case of Estonian innovation system and dairy industry, Ordnungspolitische Diskurse. https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/55401.
Woolthuis, R. K. Hillebrand, B. & Nooteboom, B. (2005). Trust, transaction costs and innovation systems. Technovation, 25(6), 569–585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2004.08.003.