شناسایی و اولویت‌بندی عوامل کلیدی موفقیت پژوهشگاه‌های حوزه فناوری ارتباطات و اطلاعات در ایران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

پژوهشگاه ارتباطات و فناوری اطلاعات، تهران، ایران

چکیده

پژوهشگاه‌های حوزه فناوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات (فاوا)، پیشران حرکت به ­سمت انقلاب صنعتی چهارم قلمداد می‌شوند. برخی از این پژوهشگاه‌ها در شناسایی عواملی که بیشترین تأثیر را بر دستیابی به اهدافشان دارند دچار سردرگمی می‌باشند و درنتیجه احصای عوامل کلیدی موفقیت آن‌ها ضروری است. براین‌اساس پژوهش حاضر ضمن شناسایی عوامل کلیدی موفقیت برخی از پژوهشگاه ­های موفق جهان در حوزه فاوا، به ارزیابی و اولویت‌بندی عوامل موفقیت شناسایی‌شده در پژوهشگاه‌های حوزه فاوای ایران با استفاده از نگاشت ادراکی فازی می‌پردازد. دراین‌راستا عوامل کلیدی موفقیت برای 8 پژوهشگاه‌ منتخب براساس اسناد راهبردی موجود و روش تحلیل مضمون شناسایی شدند و سپس نگاشت ادراکی فازی براساس چهار ماتریس تأثیر اولیه، تأثیر فازی، قدرت تأثیر و تأثیر نهایی و با به‌کارگیری نرم‌افزار منتال مُدلر ایجاد شد. باتوجه‌به مدل ایجادشده، ضمن ایجاد چهار سناریو در نرم­افزار، تغییرات نسبی هر شاخص مشخص شد. براساس نتایج بهترین سناریو، عواملی نظیر نظام مدیریتی اثربخش و کارا، اتصال به شبکه­های علمی مرتبط، یکپارچه­سازی صنعت با کاربردهای فاوا و فرایندهای چابک و منعطف بیشترین تأثیرگذاری را بر موفقیت مراکز پژوهشی حوزه فاوا دارند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Identifying and Prioritizing the Key Success Factors of ICT Research Institutes in Iran

نویسندگان [English]

  • Ehram Safari
  • Mohammad Kazem Sayadi
Research Faculty for ICT Policy Making and Strategic Management, Iran Telecommunication Research Center, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

ICT research centers are the research arm of the movement towards the fourth industrial revolution. Some of these centers are confused in identifying the factors that have the greatest impact on achieving their goals, and it is necessary to extract their success factors by research. This research first identifies the key success factors of some of the world's most successful ICT research institutes and then evaluates and prioritizes the identified success factors in Iran's ICT research institutes using fuzzy cognitive mapping. The statistical population of the research is ICT experts and professors. In this research, eight research institutes were selected for comparative study. The key success factors for the selected research institutes are identified based on the existing strategic documents and thematic analysis method, and then, based on the four matrices of initial impact, fuzzy impact, impact power, and final impact, and Mental Modeler software, the fuzzy cognitive mapping is created. According to the created model, four scenarios are created in the software and the relative changes of each index are determined. Based on the results of the best scenario, factors such as effective and efficient management systems, connection to relevant scientific networks, integration of industry with ICT applications.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Research institutes
  • Fuzzy cognitive mapping
  • Thematic Analysis
  • Development of ICT

مراجع

Arman Mehr, M., Ahmadi, S., Maniei, R., & Arman Mehr, W. (2015). Examining the critical success factors in the field of higher education using fuzzy perceptual mapping and active Hebin learning [In Persian]. Iranian Higher Education Association Quarterly, 7(1), 109-130. http://ihej.ir/article-1-561-fa.html
Asadi, M. M., Mirghafouri, S. H., & Ghasemloi Soltanabad, J. (2020). A proposed model for tourism development in Iran using fuzzy cognitive mapping [In Persian]. Scientific Quarterly Journal of Tourism Management Studies, 15(3), 285-305. https://doi.org/10.22054/tms.2020.26936.1815
Bandarian, R. (2011). Identifying and determining customer satisfaction criteria in research and technology organizations (RTOs); Case study: Research Institute of Petroleum Industry [In Persian]. Strategic Management Thought, 5(1), 201-222. https://doi.org/10.30497/smt.2011.155
Bronzini, R., & Piselli, P. (2009). Determinants of long-run regional productivity with geographical spillovers: The role of R&D, human capital and public infrastructure. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 39(2), 187-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2008.07.002
Bullen, C. V. & Rockart, J. F. (1981). A primer on critical success factors. Center for Information Systems Research Sloan, School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/1988/SWP-1220-08368993-CISR-069.pdf?sequen
Daiko, T., Dernis, H., Dosso, M., Gkotsis, P., Squicciarini, M., & Vezzani, A. (2017). World corporate top R&D investors: Industrial property strategies in the digital economy. Publications Office of the European Union. https://www.oecd.org/sti/world-top-rd-investors.pdf
Ebrahimi, S. A., & Eynali, M. (2019). Developing a framework to explain the public policies capture using thematic analysis and interpretive structural modeling (ISM) [In Persian]. Journal of Public Administration, 11(3), 403-430. https://doi.org/10.22059/jipa.2019.277891.2513
Eden, C., Ackermann, F., & Cropper, S. (1992). The analysis of cause maps. Journal of Management Studies, 29(3), 309-324. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1992.tb00667.x
Fartash, K., & Khayyatian, M. S. (2019). The role universities and research institutes plays in science and technology development and policies supporting them [In Persian]. Science and Technology Policy, 12(2), 255-267. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.20080840.1398.12.2.17.2
Forman, C., & Zeebroeck, N. V. (2011). From wires to partners: How the internet has fostered R&D collaborations within firms. Management Science, 58(8), 1549-1568. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1725780
https://www.fraunhofer.de/en/about-fraunhofer/corporate-responsibility/governance.html.
Ghaffari, B., & Zand Hesami, H. (2017). Identification and extract success factors influencing the commercialization of technology development projects [In Persian]. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Letters, 7(2), 17-28. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.24767220.1396.07.2.2.4
Goodarzi, M., Soofi, J. B., Aarabi, S. M. & Amiri, M. (2013). A model for technology commercialization in public research organizations of Iran [In Persian]. Journal of Technology Development Management, 1(1), 37-66, https://doi.org/10.22104/jtdm.2013.3
Hage, P., & Harary, F. (1984). Structural models in anthropology. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511659843
Hemmati, S., Azizi, M., & Shafiei, I. (2020). Identification and prioritization of success criteria in research and development projects of Iran petroleum industry research institute using fuzzy AHP approach [In Persian]. Innovation Management, 9(1), 169-204. http://www.nowavari.ir/article_108138.html
Hoosen, N. (2008). Critical success factors in the sales and distribution of bancassurance in South Africa [Master’s thesis, Wits Business School]. Core. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/39665074.pdf
Kallal, R., Haddaji, A., & Ftiti, Z. (2021). ICT diffusion and economic growth: Evidence from the sectorial analysis of a periphery country. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 162, 120403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120403
Kandasamy, W. V., & Smarandache, F. (2003). Fuzzy cognitive maps and neutrosophic cognitive maps. Infinite Study. https://arxiv.org/pdf/math/0311063
Li, Y., Hu, Y., Zhang, X., Deng, Y., & Mahadevan, S. (2014). An evidential DEMATEL method to identify critical success factors in emergency management. Applied Soft Computing, 22, 504-510, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2014.03.042
Moradi, M., Dustar, M., Ghaderifar, E. & Zanjani, B. (2013). Identifying and prioritizing the barriers to research: The case study of research centers of ministry of science, research and technology [In Persian]. Science and Technology Policy Letters, 6(1), 35-48. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.20080840.1392.6.1.5.6
Mozafari, M., & Emami, A. (2007). Review of world development organizations [In Persian]. Sabzan Publications.
Nair, M., Pradhan, R. P., & Arvin, M. B. (2020). Endogenous dynamics between R&D, ICT and economic growth: Empirical evidence from the OECD countries. Technology in Society, 62, 101315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101315
Özesmi, U., & Özesmi, S. (2003). A participatory approach to ecosystem conservation: Fuzzy cognitive maps and stakeholder group analysis in Uluabat Lake, Turkey. Environmental Management, 31(4), 0518-0531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-002-2841-1
Rajab Beigi, M., Foruzandeh Dehkordi, L. A., & Vaizy, A. (2009). Factors affecting knowledge workers' empowerment in petroleum industry [In Persian]. Iranian Management Sciences Quarterly, 4(3), 93-119. https://journal.iams.ir/article_56.html
Rodriguez-Repiso, L., Setchi, R., & Salmeron, J. (2007). Modelling IT projects success: Emerging methodologies reviewed. Technovation, 27(10), 582-594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2006.12.006
Safari, E. (2020). Strategic program of ICT Research Institute [In Persian]. ICT Research Institute.
Sajedinejad, A., Hassannaibi, E., & Ganji, A. (2020). Performance evaluation model for research institutes using an improved balanced scorecard and DEMATEL technique [In Persian]. Rahyaft, 30(2), 19-36. https://doi.org/10.22034/rahyaft.2020.13830
Sterman, J. D. (1994). Learning in and about complex systems. System Dynamics Review, 10(2-3), 291-330. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.4260100214
مدیریت توسعه فناوری
دوره 10، شماره 1
خرداد 1401
صفحه 157-184

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار