مدیریت توسعه فناوری

مدیریت توسعه فناوری

شناسایی و اولویت‌بندی پیشران‌ها و پیامدهای حکمرانی دیجیتال در شرکت‌های صنعتی (مورد مطالعه: شرکت‌های صنعتی استان لرستان)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری گروه مدیریت، دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، رودهن، ایران
2 استادیار گروه مدیریت صنعتی، واحد رودهن، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، رودهن، ایران
چکیده
این پژوهش از نوع تحقیقات آمیخته به صورت کیفی و کمی و بر مبنای فلسفه قیاسی استقرایی است. جامعه آماری پژوهش خبرگان هستند که با روش نمونه‌گیری هدفمند و بر اساس اصل کفایت نظری انتخاب‌شده‌اند. ابزار گردآوری اطلاعات در بخش کیفی مصاحبه است که روایی و پایایی آن با استفاده از روایی محتوایی و روایی نظری و روش پایایی سنجی درون کدگذار و میان کدگذار تائید شد. هم‌چنین ابزار گردآوری اطلاعات در بخش کمی پرسشنامه است. داده‌های کیفی با روش تحلیل محتوا و داده‌های کمی با روش نقشه شناختی فازی تحلیل گردید. نتایج این پژوهش حاکی از آن است که مهم‌ترین پیشران‌های پیاده‌سازی حکمرانی دیجیتال در شرکت‌های صنعتی، استقرار کمیته‌های تحول و سفیران دیجیتال در شرکت برای بارورسازی تدریجی دیجیتال واحدها، تشویق خلق سیاست‌هایی برای سرمایه‌گذاری و استفاده از فناوری دیجیتال و تسریع پیاده سازی خط‌مشی‌های اصلاح حکمرانی مبتنی‌بر مدل‌های نوین فناوری‌محور هستند. هم‌چنین ایجاد تحول مثبت و پایدار در شرکت مبتنی بر نوگرایی و توسعه، تسریع شناسایی علت‌های وضعیت نابسامان حکمرانی سازمانی با ارائه راه‌حل‌های کارشناسانه و فناورانه و تزریق راهکارهای فناورانه و ترسیم یک فرایند نوآوری در ساختار و تصمیمات به‌عنوان مهم‌ترین پیامدهای پیاده‌سازی حکمرانی دیجیتال در شرکت‌های صنعتی شناسایی شدند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Identifying and analyzing the drivers and consequences of implementing digital governance in industrial companies using the FCM method

نویسندگان English

Reza Derikvand 1
Saber Khandan Alamdari 2
Tahereh Hasoomi 2
1 PhD student, Department of Management, Faculty of Management, Islamic Azad University, Roudehen, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Industrial Management, Roudehen Branch, Islamic Azad University, Roudehen, Iran
چکیده English

This study is a mixed qualitative and quantitative research based on the inductive deductive philosophy. The statistical population of the study is experts who were selected using purposive sampling and based on the principle of theoretical adequacy. The data collection tool in the qualitative part is an interview, Also, the data collection tool in the quantitative part is a questionnaire, Qualitative data were analyzed using content analysis and quantitative data using fuzzy cognitive map. The results of this study indicate that the most important drivers of implementing digital governance in industrial companies are establishing transformation committees and digital ambassadors in the company for the gradual digital fertilization of units, encouraging the creation of policies for investment and use of digital technology, and accelerating the implementation of governance reform policies based on new technology-oriented models. Also, creating positive and sustainable transformation in the company based on innovation and development, accelerating the identification of the causes of the disorderly state of organizational governance by providing expert and technological solutions, injecting technological solutions, and drawing an innovation process in the structure and decisions were identified as the most important consequences of implementing digital governance in industrial companies.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Governance
Digital Governance
Industrial Companies
Fuzzy Cognitive Map
Abdarzadeh, P., Roshandel Arbatani, T., Keimasi, M. and Aqili, S. V. (2022). Providing a model of good e-governance in the online business environment of the insurance industry. Journal of Business Management, 13(4), 864-885. doi: 10.22059/jibm.2021.321920.4096 [In Persian]
Alaei, M., Safdari Ranjbar, M. and Faham, E. (2025). The Transition to Industry 4.0 from a Sustainable Development Perspective: A Meta-Synthesis of Opportunities, Challenges, and Policy Requirements. Journal of Technology Development Management, 13(1), -. doi: 10.22104/jtdm.2026.7637.3415 [In Persian]
Barbosa, L. S. (2017). Digital governance for sustainable development. In Digital Nations–Smart Cities, Innovation, and Sustainability: 16th IFIP WG 6.11 Conference on e-Business, e-Services, and e-Society, I3E 2017, Delhi, India, November 21–23, 2017, Proceedings 16 (pp. 85-93). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68557-1_9
Better, B. B. (2020). Covid-19 on the Arab region an opportunity to build back better. https://www.unescwa.org/sites/default/files/archive/sg_policy_brief_covid-19_and_arab_states_english_version_july_2020.pdf
Chen, Y. C. (2017). Managing digital governance: issues, challenges, and solutions. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Managing-Digital-Governance-Issues-Challenges-and-Solutions/Chen/p/book/9781439890912
Deghati, A., Yaghoubi, N., Kamalian, A. R., Dehghani, M. and Moradi, E. (2019). Presenting an Establishment and Development Pattern of Electronic Governance Using Meta-synthesis
Approach... Public Administration Perspective, 10(4), 89-120. doi: 10.48308/jpap.2019.96614 [In persian]
Erkut, B. (2020). From digital government to digital governance: are we there yet? Sustainability, 12(3), 860. 10.3390/su12030860
, December). Digital Governance Adoption: Exploring Drivers, Impacts, and ۲۰۲۴Firman, B. (
۳۲-) (pp. ۲۰۲۴th Open Society Conference (OSC ۶Strategic Innovations across Sectors. In
). Atlantis Press. 10.2991/978-2-38476-340-5_4۴۴
Foruzesh, A., kasraee, A., Dinpanah, A. and charmchian langroudi, M. (2024). Governance model for the development of Internet of Things technology in Iran's technological agriculture. Journal of Technology Development Management, 12(1), 108-136. doi: 10.22104/jtdm.2024.6781.3281
Ghasabzadeh langari, Z. , Kamalian, A. R. , Yaghoubi, N. M. , Doost Mohammadian, H. and Aramesh, H. (2023). Investigating the Effect of e-governance on Organizational Sustainability with Mediating Role of Good Governance. Public Administration Perspective, 14(2), 139-161. doi: 10.48308/jpap.2023.103568 [In persian]
Hasan, I., & Rizvi, S. (2022). Knowledge Management Framework for Sustainability and Resilience in Next-Gen e-Governance. In Data Engineering for Smart Systems (pp. 191-203). Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2641-8_18
Idzi, F. M., & Gomes, R. C. (2022). Digital governance: government strategies that impact public services. Global Public Policy and Governance, 2(4), 427-452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43508-022-00055-w
Indriasari, E., Supangkat, S., & Kosala, R., (2020). Digital Transformation: IT governance in the agile environment. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 9(4), 45-55. https://www.ijstr.org/final-print/apr2020/Digital-Transformation-It-Governance-In-The-Agile-Environment-A-Study-Case-Of-Indonesia-High-Regulated-Company.pdf
Jinah, H. H. K. (2021). Reflection of The Use of Intranet to Improve the Performance of Electronic Governance an Exploratory Study of the Ministry of Higher Education and Al-Karkh Education Directorate. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 12(4), 1182-1193. https://turcomat.org/index.php/turkbilmat/article/view/632
Khodadadi, A. & Abbaspour, A. (2014). Modeling Digital Governance in Virtual Organizations in the Public Sector: A Case Study of the Social Security Insurance Organization. Iranian Monthly Journal of Political Sociology. 5(12). 3231-3246. 10.30510/psi.2022.339758.3407 [In persian]
Kwilinski, A., Lyulyov, O., & Pimonenko, T. (2023). The coupling and coordination degree of digital business and digital governance in the context of sustainable development. Information, 14(12), 651. https://doi.org/10.3390/info14120651
Manoharan, A. P., Melitski, J., & Holzer, M. (2023). Digital governance: An assessment of performance and best practices. Public Organization Review, 23(1), 265-283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-021-00584-8
Mazari, E. (2024). Providing a digital governance model of education: A meta synthesis study. Research on Educational Leadership and Management, 8(31), 55-83. 10.22054/jrlat.2024.78978.1731 [In Persian]
Milakovich, M. E. (2014, October). Digital governance and collaborative strategies for improving service quality. In International Conference on Knowledge Management and Information Sharing (Vol. 2, pp. 109-118). SciTePress. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203815991
Mökander, J., & Floridi, L. (2022). From algorithmic accountability to digital governance. Nature Machine Intelligence, 4(6), 508-509. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-022-00504-5
Nourijani, A., Eslami, H., Afshani, S. A. and Dehghan dehnavi, H. (2023). Presenting the Ideal Model of Digital Governance in the Era of Networked Society. New Media Studies, 9(34), 429-399. doi: 10.22054/nms.2023.72100.1543 [In persian]
Parvin, B., Shayan, A., Poorebrahimi, A. and Radfar, R. (2024). Future Study of Digital Governance in Direction of Urban Smartness with a Sustainable Approach in the Level of the Megalopolis of the Country. Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management, 40(1), 93-124. doi: 10.22034/jipm.2024.2009260.1311 [In Persian]
Tiwari, S. P. (2022). Organizational competitiveness and digital governance challenges. 10.22541/au.164848892.29442802/v1
Tapscott, D., & Agnew, D. (1999). Governance in the digital economy. Finance & Development, 36(4), 34–37
Zambrano, R., & Seward, R. K. (2013). From connectivity to service delivery: case studies in e-governance. New York. https://local2030.org/library/59/From-Connectivity-to-Service-Delivery--Case-Studies-in-e-Governance.pdf

  • تاریخ دریافت 06 بهمن 1404
  • تاریخ بازنگری 20 خرداد 1405
  • تاریخ پذیرش 24 خرداد 1405